Home   »   SC Reservation In Tribal Area –...

SC Reservation In Tribal Area – Supreme Court Judgement – Free PDF

SC Reservation In Tribal Area – Supreme Court Judgement – Free PDF_4.1
 

SC Reservation In Tribal Area – Supreme Court Judgement – Free PDF_5.1

SC Reservation In Tribal Area – Supreme Court Judgement – Free PDF_6.1

  • A five-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court ruled on 22nd April 2020 that 100% reservation for teachers from  Scheduled Tribes category at schools in scheduled areas was constitutionally invalid.
  • What was the matter?
  • In January 2000, an order was passed by the then governor of erstwhile Andhra Pradesh providing 100% reservation  to tribal candidates in teacher posts in ‘scheduled area’.
  • The Governor of then undivided Andhra Pradesh had cited Schedule V of the Constitution to pass the government

Reason for bringing the rule

  • The AP government order said the reservation was
  1. to promote educational development of Tribals,
  2. to solve the phenomenal absenteeism of Teachers in the  Schools situated in Scheduled Areas and
  3. with a view to protect the interests of local tribals

 

Scheduled Areas – Special provisions in Constitution

  • Schedule V – Administration of Scheduled Areas in states  other than Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura and Mizoram.
  • Schedule VI – protects tribal interests in those four states  (Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura and Mizoram) excluded in the  Fifth Schedule
  • In Scheduled Areas declared so under the Fifth Schedule,  the governor of the state has special responsibilities with  respect to tribal populations in the area including issuing
  • directives to the state government and limiting the effect of  acts of the central or state legislature on the Schedule Area.

States having Schedule V Areas

  1. Andhra Pradesh,
  2. Chhattisgarh,
  3. Gujarat,
  4. Himachal Pradesh,
  5. Jharkhand,

SC Reservation In Tribal Area – Supreme Court Judgement – Free PDF_7.1

Special Provisions for Fifth Schedule Areas

  • The Governor of each State having Scheduled Areas (SA) shall annually, or whenever so required by the President,  make a report to the President regarding the administration  of Scheduled Areas in that State.
  • The Union Government shall have executive powers to give directions to the States as to the administration of the  Scheduled Areas.
  • Fifth Schedule provides for establishment of a Tribes Advisory Council (TAC) in any State having Scheduled Areas.
  • The Governor may, by public notification, direct that any particular Act of Parliament or of the Legislature of the State  shall or shall not apply to a SA or any part thereof in the  State, subject to such exceptions and modifications, as  specified
  • Paragraph 5(1) of Schedule V empowers the Governor to issue a notification directing that any central or state law may not  apply to a scheduled area or shall apply to the area with  modifications and exemptions.
  • The then Andhra Pradesh Governor had cited this provision.

Laws of the state

  • AP Regulation of Reservation and Appointment to Public Services Act 1997, which deals with reservation in public  services in the State.
  • Andhra Pradesh State and Subordinate Service Rules 1996, which provides for 6 % reservation for Scheduled Tribes in  the State
  • This order was set aside by the Andhra Pradesh Administrative
  • Tribunal, but later upheld by the Andhra Pradesh High Court.
  • The Supreme court held that creation of 100 % reservation  through the government order was akin to making a new law
  • Schedule V only allows the Governor to not apply or apply a law to a scheduled area with modifications.
  • It does not allow the Governor to make a new law altogether.
  • The court held 100 per cent reservation unconstitutional as it was “discriminatory” against not just ‘open’ category  candidates, but also against Scheduled Castes and Other  Backward Classes.
  • “It is an obnoxious idea that only tribals should teach the  tribals. When there are other local residents, why they cannot  teach is not understandable.”

Article 371-D ?

  • The Supreme court said the order was “arbitrary” and not  permissible under the Constitution.
  • It also imposed a penalty of Rs 5 lakh on the Andhra Pradesh  and Telangana governments and sought an explanation for  surpassing the 50% ceiling on quotas.
  • 1992 judgement of Indra Sawhney vs Union Of India, which  reinforced the 50% ceiling on quotas
  • The courts have in the past asserted that the 50% limit is  essential to protect equality. This was because, the courts  have argued, when reservations cross 50%, it upsets the  balance between the reserved and the unreserved  categories, thereby having an impact on the promise of  equality guaranteed under the Constitution.
  • According to the 1992 verdict, to exceed the 50% cap, there  must be a special case.
  • There were no such extraordinary circumstances to provide a 100% reservation in scheduled areas in this case, acc to SC.

The court concluded that reservation in the case violated

  • Article 14 – equality before law
  • Article 15(1) – discrimination against citizens
  • Article 16 – equal opportunity

PARTICULARLY VULNERABLE TRIBAL GROUPS in Telangana

  • KOLAMS: Largest PvTG Community with 0.44 lakhs population,  spread across Adilabad, Asifabad and Mancheriyal districts.  Their main occupation is Basketry and Bamboo craft. Their  traditional festivals are Bheemanna jatara and Laxmidevara  Jatara.
  • CHENCHUS: Nallamalla Forests, with a population of 0.16  lakhs. Their main occupation is foraging, Honey gathering,  Hunting and fishing. Their traditional festivals include  Saleshwaram and Bhourapur Jataras.
  • THOTI:  Adilabad Tract. They are dependant community on  Gonds. Their traditional occupation is Barding, Body art,  Tattooing.
  • KONDA REDDIS: Their main occupation is bamboo craft. Their important festivals are Mamidi Kothapanduga.

 
 

 

Latest Burning Issues | Free PDF

 
SC Reservation In Tribal Area – Supreme Court Judgement – Free PDF_4.1

Sharing is caring!

[related_posts_view]