Table of Contents
- Frauds reported by banks of ₹100,000 and above have more than doubled in value to ₹1.85 trillion in FY20.
- The number of such cases increased by 28% in the same period
When the fraud took place?
- The date of occurrence of these frauds are spread over several previous years and are accounted for in the financial year when they are reported.
- Banks, on an average, took two years to detect fraud after it had occurred.
- The delay was even greater for large frauds of ₹100 crore and above with an average lag of 5 years.
In which segment?
- A majority of these frauds are in loan portfolios of banks, both in termsof number and value.
- Frauds in loans constituted 98% of the total frauds or at ₹1.82 trillion
Top 50 frauds
- There was a concentration of large value frauds.
- The top 50 credit-related frauds constituting 76% of the total amount reported as frauds during 2019-20.
Public sector banks
- Public sector banks accounted for 80% of the ₹1.85 trillion reported as frauds in FY20.
- Followed by private sector banks at 18%.
What happens when bank declare certain amount as fraud?
- Once an account is declared fraud,
- Banks need to set aside 100% of the outstanding loans as provisions,
- Either in one go or over four quarters
Why do frauds take place more at PSBs?
- Big loan advance frauds happen as bank officials collude with borrowers and sometimes even with officials of third parties such as advocates and chartered accountants.
- Post loan sanction, the monitoring is weaker than at private banks due to lack of expertise and modern tech resources.
- Officers retire before they can be booked for fraud.
- Weak selection process and lower pay than at private banks are among key reasons.
- PSB staff are not offered appropriate incentives to prevent or detect frauds early.
What RBI says on these frauds?
- The central bank has been trying to reduce the gap between the occurrence of a fraud and its
- While the frauds framework focuses on prevention, early detection and prompt reporting,
- The average lag in detection of frauds remains long.
Reasons for the delay in frauds detection
- Weak implementation of early warning signals (EWS) by banks.
- Non-detection of EWS during internal audits.
- Non-cooperation of borrowers during forensic audits.
- Inconclusive audit reports.
- Lack of decision making in joint lenders’ meetings
- According to RBI,
- The EWS mechanism is getting revamped alongside strengthening of the concurrent audit function,
- With timely and conclusive forensic audits of borrower accounts under scrutiny.
ABBF
- In this regard, it had set up the advisory board for banking frauds (ABBF)
- In consultation with the CVC.
- The ABBF functions as the first level of examination of all fraud cases above 50 crores
Malegam committee
- The decision follows recommendation by an RBI-constituted expert committee on NPA and frauds headed by YH Malegam in 2018.
Latest Burning Issues | Free PDF