Deprecated: Return type of Mediavine\Grow\Share_Count_Url_Counts::offsetExists($offset) should either be compatible with ArrayAccess::offsetExists(mixed $offset): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in /var/www/html/wp-content/plugins/social-pug/inc/class-share-count-url-counts.php on line 102

Deprecated: Return type of Mediavine\Grow\Share_Count_Url_Counts::offsetGet($offset) should either be compatible with ArrayAccess::offsetGet(mixed $offset): mixed, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in /var/www/html/wp-content/plugins/social-pug/inc/class-share-count-url-counts.php on line 112

Deprecated: Return type of Mediavine\Grow\Share_Count_Url_Counts::offsetSet($offset, $value) should either be compatible with ArrayAccess::offsetSet(mixed $offset, mixed $value): void, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in /var/www/html/wp-content/plugins/social-pug/inc/class-share-count-url-counts.php on line 122

Deprecated: Return type of Mediavine\Grow\Share_Count_Url_Counts::offsetUnset($offset) should either be compatible with ArrayAccess::offsetUnset(mixed $offset): void, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in /var/www/html/wp-content/plugins/social-pug/inc/class-share-count-url-counts.php on line 131

Deprecated: Return type of Mediavine\Grow\Share_Count_Url_Counts::getIterator() should either be compatible with IteratorAggregate::getIterator(): Traversable, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in /var/www/html/wp-content/plugins/social-pug/inc/class-share-count-url-counts.php on line 183

Deprecated: Mediavine\Grow\Share_Count_Url_Counts implements the Serializable interface, which is deprecated. Implement __serialize() and __unserialize() instead (or in addition, if support for old PHP versions is necessary) in /var/www/html/wp-content/plugins/social-pug/inc/class-share-count-url-counts.php on line 16
Home   »   UPSC Mains GS Paper 2 Model...

e-governance, as a critical tool of governance, has ushered in effectiveness, transparency and accountability in governments. What inadequacies hamper the enhancement of these features?

Q8. e-governance, as a critical tool of governance, has ushered in effectiveness, transparency and accountability in governments. What inadequacies hamper the enhancement of these features? (10m) – Governance

Introduction

You can start the answer by how e- governance has gained prominence in India:

E-governance, which uses information and communication technologies (ICTs) to improve the delivery of government services, has found widespread adoption in India via a number of initiatives such as Digital India mission, National e-governance plan etc.

Body

The benefits provided by e-governance can be discussed in short followed by the inadequacies:

E-governance, as a critical tool of governance, has ushered in:

  • Effectiveness: by automating tasks, streamlining processes, and reducing paperwork. 
    • E.g. Reduced processing times for income tax filing and passport applications.
  • Transparency: by making government information readily accessible to citizens.
    • E.g. Online RTI Portals 
  • Accountability: by holding government officials accountable for their public expenditure and holding them accountable for their actions.
    • E.g. The use of Aadhaar for direct benefit transfers (DBT) has reduced leakage and corruption in subsidy programs. 

Inadequacies hampering  e-governance in India:

  • Digital divide:
      • Urban-rural divide: Only 14.9% of rural households have internet access compared to 42% in urban areas.
      • Gender divide:  25% of adult women in India own smartphones compared to 41% of adult men.
  • Low levels of digital literacy: only 38 percent of households in the country are digitally literate.
  • Privacy and security concerns: In 2023, a data breach in the CoWIN portal exposed the personal data of over 3 million people.
  • Lack of Legal and Regulatory Frameworks: to address issues like digital rights, data protection, and online accountability, leaving gaps in the legal framework.
  • Interoperability Issues: Interoperability and data sharing among various government departments in e-governance can be complex and costly.
  • Corruption: According to a 2021 report by Transparency International, India ranked 85th out of 180 countries on the Corruption Perception Index.
  • Inadequate Infrastructure: Lack of internet connectivity and continuous supply of electricity in rural areas is a great challenge for effective e-governance.

Conclusion:

You can conclude by listing the Key recommendations by the 2nd Administrative Reforms Commission (2nd ARC) for e-governance, that include:

  • Promote the use of Public-Private Partnership (PPP) mode for certain components of e-governance projects.
  • Develop a strategy to protect critical information infrastructure assets.
  • Upgrade the skills of individuals associated with e-governance project implementation.
  • Maintain State Data Centres (SDCs) by government agencies like NIC, especially for handling sovereign data.
  • Attention should be given to improve digital infrastructure especially in rural areas.

 

 

Check out the UPSC Mains GS Paper 2 2023 Analysis with detailed expatiation of the topics of Mains GS Paper 2 By the Study IQ Experts

Sharing is caring!

Download your free content now!

Congratulations!

We have received your details!

We'll share General Studies Study Material on your E-mail Id.

Download your free content now!

We have already received your details!

We'll share General Studies Study Material on your E-mail Id.

Incorrect details? Fill the form again here

General Studies PDF

Thank You, Your details have been submitted we will get back to you.

TOPICS:

[related_posts_view]

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *