Deprecated: Return type of Mediavine\Grow\Share_Count_Url_Counts::offsetExists($offset) should either be compatible with ArrayAccess::offsetExists(mixed $offset): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in /var/www/html/wp-content/plugins/social-pug/inc/class-share-count-url-counts.php on line 102

Deprecated: Return type of Mediavine\Grow\Share_Count_Url_Counts::offsetGet($offset) should either be compatible with ArrayAccess::offsetGet(mixed $offset): mixed, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in /var/www/html/wp-content/plugins/social-pug/inc/class-share-count-url-counts.php on line 112

Deprecated: Return type of Mediavine\Grow\Share_Count_Url_Counts::offsetSet($offset, $value) should either be compatible with ArrayAccess::offsetSet(mixed $offset, mixed $value): void, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in /var/www/html/wp-content/plugins/social-pug/inc/class-share-count-url-counts.php on line 122

Deprecated: Return type of Mediavine\Grow\Share_Count_Url_Counts::offsetUnset($offset) should either be compatible with ArrayAccess::offsetUnset(mixed $offset): void, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in /var/www/html/wp-content/plugins/social-pug/inc/class-share-count-url-counts.php on line 131

Deprecated: Return type of Mediavine\Grow\Share_Count_Url_Counts::getIterator() should either be compatible with IteratorAggregate::getIterator(): Traversable, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in /var/www/html/wp-content/plugins/social-pug/inc/class-share-count-url-counts.php on line 183

Deprecated: Mediavine\Grow\Share_Count_Url_Counts implements the Serializable interface, which is deprecated. Implement __serialize() and __unserialize() instead (or in addition, if support for old PHP versions is necessary) in /var/www/html/wp-content/plugins/social-pug/inc/class-share-count-url-counts.php on line 16

Warning: Undefined array key "_aioseop_description" in /var/www/html/wp-content/themes/job-child/functions.php on line 554

Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type null in /var/www/html/wp-content/themes/job-child/functions.php on line 554

Deprecated: parse_url(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($url) of type string is deprecated in /var/www/html/wp-content/themes/job-child/functions.php on line 925
Home   »   RBI Proposes 4-Tier Structure For NBFCs...

RBI Proposes 4-Tier Structure For NBFCs – Free PDF Download

 

What is a Non-Banking Financial Company?

  • NBFCs are financial institutions that offer various banking services but do not have a banking license.
  • These institutions are not allowed to take traditional demand deposits.
  • In India, NBFC is a company registered under theCompanies Act, 1956 engaged in the business of loans and advances, acquisition of shares/stocks/bonds/debentures/securities, leasing, hire-purchase, insurance business, chit business etc.

What has happened?

  • Reserve Bank of India on Friday released discussion paper on revised regulatory framework for Non-Banking Financial Companies (NBFCs).
  • Regulatory framework for NBFCs needs to be re-oriented to keep pace with changing realities in financial sector, the central bank said.

Why this new framework?

  • The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has proposed a tighter regulatory framework for non-banking financial companies,
  • By creating a four-tier structure with a progressive increase in intensity of regulation.
  • RBI has said the regulatory and supervisory framework of NBFCs should be based on a four-layered structure:
  • Base Layer, Middle Layer, Upper Layer and a Top Layer.
  • It has also proposed classification of non-performing assets (NPAs) of base layer NBFCs from 180 days to 90 days
  • NBFCs in lower layer will be known as NBFC-Base Layer m(NBFC-BL).
  • NBFCs in middle layer will be known as NBFC-Middle Layer (NBFC-ML).
  • An NBFC in the Upper Layer will be known as NBFC-Upper Layer (NBFC-UL) and will invite a new regulatory superstructure.

So, what?

  • Once an NBFC is identified as NBFC-UL, it will be subject to enhanced regulatory requirement at least for four years from its last appearance in the category,
  • Even where it does not meet the parametric criteria in the subsequent year.
  • “Hence, if an identified NBFC-UL does not meet the criteria for classification for four consecutive years, it will move out of the enhanced regulatory framework,” it said.
  • The NBFC sector has seen tremendous growth in recent years.
  • In last five years alone, size of balance sheet of NBFCs (including HFCs) has more than doubled from Rs 20.72 lakh crore (2015) to Rs 49.22 lakh crore (2020).

The 4 layers

  • BASE LAYER: If the framework is visualised as a pyramid, the bottom of the pyramid, where least regulatory intervention is warranted.
  • It can consist of NBFCs, currently classified as non-systemically important NBFCs (NBFC-ND), NBFCP2P lending platforms, Type I NBFCs etc.
  • MIDDLE LAYER: As one moves up, the next layer can consist of NBFCs currently classified as systemically important NBFCs (NBFC-ND-SI), deposit taking NBFCs (NBFC-D), housing finance companies, IFCs, IDFs, SPDs and core investment companies.
  • The regulatory regime for this layer will be stricter compared to the base layer.
  • Adverse regulatory arbitrage vis-à-vis banks can be addressed for NBFCs falling in this layer in order to reduce systemic risk spill-overs, where required, the RBI said.
  • UPPER LAYER: Going further, the next layer can consist of NBFCs which are identified as systemically significant
  • This layer will be populated by NBFCs which have large potential of systemic spill-over of risks and have the ability to impact financial stability.
  • There is no parallel for this layer at present, as this will be a new layer for regulation.
  • The regulatory framework for NBFCs falling in this layer will be bank-like, albeit with suitable and appropriate modifications, it said.
  • TOP LAYER: It is possible that considered supervisory judgment might push some NBFCs from out of the upper layer of the systemically significant NBFCs for higher regulation/supervision.
  • These NBFCs will occupy the top of the upper layer as a distinct set.
  • Ideally, this top layer of the pyramid will remain empty unless supervisors take a view on specific
  • In other words, if certain NBFCs lying in the upper layer are seen to pose extreme risks as per supervisory judgement, they can be put to higher and bespoke regulatory/supervisory requirements.

Conclusion

  • In view of the recent stress in the sector, it has become imperative to re-examine the suitability of this regulatory approach,
  • Especially when failure of an extremely large NBFC can precipitate systemic risks, the RBI paper said.
  • The regulatory framework for NBFCs needs to be reoriented to keep pace with changing realities in the financial sector.

Q) Which of the following statements regarding NBFCs in India?

  1. Top 50 NBFC accounts for 80% of market share by loans.
  2. In last 10 years the compounded annual growth rate of NBFCs have been more than commercial banks.
  1. 1 only
  2. 2 only
  3. Both 1 & 2
  4. None of the above

 
 

 

Latest Burning Issues | Free PDF

 

Sharing is caring!

Download your free content now!

Congratulations!

We have received your details!

We'll share General Studies Study Material on your E-mail Id.

Download your free content now!

We have already received your details!

We'll share General Studies Study Material on your E-mail Id.

Incorrect details? Fill the form again here

General Studies PDF

Thank You, Your details have been submitted we will get back to you.
[related_posts_view]

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *