Deprecated: Return type of Mediavine\Grow\Share_Count_Url_Counts::offsetExists($offset) should either be compatible with ArrayAccess::offsetExists(mixed $offset): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in /var/www/html/wp-content/plugins/social-pug/inc/class-share-count-url-counts.php on line 102

Deprecated: Return type of Mediavine\Grow\Share_Count_Url_Counts::offsetGet($offset) should either be compatible with ArrayAccess::offsetGet(mixed $offset): mixed, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in /var/www/html/wp-content/plugins/social-pug/inc/class-share-count-url-counts.php on line 112

Deprecated: Return type of Mediavine\Grow\Share_Count_Url_Counts::offsetSet($offset, $value) should either be compatible with ArrayAccess::offsetSet(mixed $offset, mixed $value): void, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in /var/www/html/wp-content/plugins/social-pug/inc/class-share-count-url-counts.php on line 122

Deprecated: Return type of Mediavine\Grow\Share_Count_Url_Counts::offsetUnset($offset) should either be compatible with ArrayAccess::offsetUnset(mixed $offset): void, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in /var/www/html/wp-content/plugins/social-pug/inc/class-share-count-url-counts.php on line 131

Deprecated: Return type of Mediavine\Grow\Share_Count_Url_Counts::getIterator() should either be compatible with IteratorAggregate::getIterator(): Traversable, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in /var/www/html/wp-content/plugins/social-pug/inc/class-share-count-url-counts.php on line 183

Deprecated: Mediavine\Grow\Share_Count_Url_Counts implements the Serializable interface, which is deprecated. Implement __serialize() and __unserialize() instead (or in addition, if support for old PHP versions is necessary) in /var/www/html/wp-content/plugins/social-pug/inc/class-share-count-url-counts.php on line 16

Warning: Undefined array key "_aioseop_description" in /var/www/html/wp-content/themes/job-child/functions.php on line 554

Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type null in /var/www/html/wp-content/themes/job-child/functions.php on line 554

Deprecated: parse_url(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($url) of type string is deprecated in /var/www/html/wp-content/themes/job-child/functions.php on line 925
Home   »   UPSC Mains Previous Year Question With...

UPSC Mains Previous Year Question With Answer Lecture 11 – UPSC Mains Paper Writing- Free PDF

Q.) Assess the main administrative issues and socio-cultural problems in the integration process of Indian Princely States. (Answer in 150 words) (10)

Q.) एकीकरण में मुख्य प्रशासनिक मुद्दों और सामाजिकसांस्कृतिक समस्याओं का आकलन करें भारतीय रियासतों की प्रक्रिया।

General Studies-I : (Indian Heritage and Culture, History and Geography of the World and Society)

Administrative issues:

  • Bhopal, Travancore and Hyderabad announced that they did not intend to join either dominion.
  • Princely States started negotiating with Pakistan or European countries to either accede or remain independent.

Socio-cultural problems:

  • Several princely states had diverse population. Some of the states that had Muslim population were ruled by a Hindu king while others that had Hindu majority population were ruled by a Muslim leader.
  • Sardar Patel and V.p Menon.
  • Integration of princely states into India on eve of independence was crucial last step towards realising the dream of an independent Republic of India. But the difference in conditions, issues and aspirations provided difficulties that required stoic attention. 

Following administrative issues hindered integration of princely states: 

  • Territorial Contiguity or lack of it such as in Patiala, Kapurthala etc. which were combined into PEPSU, or Jammu and Kashmir whose connectivity was threatened due to disruption of railway and roads passing through areas under Pakistan.
  • Lapse of British paramountcy created a lacuna of sovereignty.
  • Residual Powers: Princely states surrendered only rights enumerated in Instrument of Accession and retained administrative roles as rulers.
  • The question of authority versus popular will as the legitimate deciding factor divided opinions, such as in Junagadh, Hyderabad and J&K.
  • Princely Privileges: The extent of privileges to be retained, nature of compensation and hierarchy among princes, privy purses etc. were points of contention.
  • Religious role of Kings such as of Travancore in management of Padmanabhaswamy temple and its assets were complex problems.

Following socio-cultural problems existed in integration of Indian princely states: 

  • Hyderabad had problems of peasant discontent. For example, the Telangana movement. 
  • J&K had social discontent against the king, and a communal divide in economic status. 
  • There was cultural difference between Telugu-speaking parts of Hyderabad and Urdu-speaking and Marathi speaking regions. 
  • There was economic divide between regions to be integrated such as between Baroda and other princely states of Saurashtra region.  
  • Integration of Indian princely state is a mark of administrative statesmanship and socio-cultural integration of a diverse people with diverse aspirations.

 

 

Download | Free PDF

 

 

Sharing is caring!

Download your free content now!

Congratulations!

We have received your details!

We'll share General Studies Study Material on your E-mail Id.

Download your free content now!

We have already received your details!

We'll share General Studies Study Material on your E-mail Id.

Incorrect details? Fill the form again here

General Studies PDF

Thank You, Your details have been submitted we will get back to you.
[related_posts_view]

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *